Sunday, October 24, 2010

Hiking Half Dome

It seems perhaps a tad serendipitous that I should be writing again after such a long absence with the same locale and themes of my last entry. A few weeks ago, I found myself in California once more, reuniting with Semester at Sea friends, this time to celebrate one of them getting married (congratulations again, Jess). But, this being an SAS group, some of us met nowhere near the Orange County wedding, instead finding each other in San Francisco before road tripping out to Yosemite National Park, my friend Mark and I being hellbent on hiking Half Dome in the Yosemite Valley. Half Dome, for those of you not up to brush on your National Park knowledge, is the iconic rock (the term "rock" here used loosely) that peaks at an elevation of 8,836ft, some 5,000ft above the Valley floor. Oh, and with a sheer cliff face. You see the appeal.

The trail was to be an all-day excursion. It is a 17-mile round-trip hike with an elevation change of 4,800ft each way, following along a portion of the John Muir trail. By 7am Mark and I wandered out of our lodging bright-eyed and chilled in the crisp October morning, carrying a backpack full of overpriced sandwiches, Clif bars, and bottles of water. When we asked at the front desk which bus took us to the trailhead, we were greeted with,

"Are you hiking half dome?"

"Gonna try!"

"I wouldn't recommend it. Unless you have ice picks and crampons. It's slippery up there and it snowed last night."

Alarmists. By 8am we were on the trailhead, but before passing this sign, which seemed to give some credence to their warnings.


Okay. I'm a strong-headed hiker and I'm not easily discouraged once I have come a great distance to achieve a great thing. But it's not like we were the only people hiking, we could very easily turn around if need be, and I learned in New Zealand that the payoff for seeing what was possible could be fantastic.

So we hiked. Up. For five hours. Around the back end of Half Dome, away from the Valley, with almost no conception of how much elevation we were gaining. Actually, we were quite ignorant to begin with all round. Looking up at the sheer cliff faces all around us, we went back and forth on just which one was Half Dome. We had driven in the night before in the dark, you see, and so we had never even gotten a clear view of the Valley. Additionally, we never bothered to look at a trail map, assuming that such a famous trail in a National Park would be clearly marked. Which it mostly was, except for one time when we came across a few other hikers scratching their heads at an unmarked fork. Also there was the one time when the trail did a switchback and I did not, ambling right into the forest until Mark called me out on my idiocy.




And then we came to a place that essentially stopped me in my tracks as I realized what we'd gotten ourselves into.


There was no longer any question of where we were headed, and the sheer immensity of the rock put into perspective as well. We crossed an enormous, flat granite pass on the way to the base of Half Dome where the trees were more sparse, and on all sides was an extraordinary view of forests and snow-capped peaks in the background. But the challenge yet lied ahead, seemingly slowly growing in size and becoming a bit more intimidating as we came to the base of the final ascent, known as the cables route. A pool of climbing gloves marked the beginning of the end.

This all looked very exciting. I packed my camera away into my backpack, and we went up the final 400 feet along the cables, Mark leading. The excitement of the moment never dissipated, but a large portion of it transformed into doubt and anxiety over the treacherous route, because you see, this is one large, smooth granite dome. All those cracks and chunks you see slope downwards, and in no time at all I came to the anxious realization that were I to lose my grip on the steel cables or misstep and go tumbling, I would slide right to my death. Of this I am certain. Looking on either side I could see no possible place where I could grasp a rock or find a foothold. All I could see was one convex death trap that sloped off into oblivion all directions. I could see the end of nothing, just a sloping plane of granite that disappeared, with the Valley floor a few thousand feet below it peeking out from far away. I also happened to be keenly aware that earlier that same week six hikers had taken a tumble themselves and needed to be rescued from wherever they landed 100 feet away from the trail. In fact, every year people seem to fall to their deaths. Backpacker Magazine rates it as one of America's 10 Most Dangerous Hikes.

That's when I stopped soaking in the beauty of my surroundings and looked down at Mark's feet in front of my own, willing myself forward step by step on somewhat shaky legs. It was a pants-crappingly scary climb to a degree no hike has ever made me feel. The climb got steeper. People were coming down in the other direction, which meant everyone had to stop and cling for dear life to their section of cable and wait until the way was clear again. And all I could think about was, "How are we going to come down? It's steep to climb up, too steep to walk down."

But when the path leveled out I found myself on top of a surprisingly large expanse of flat granite, a plateau that sloped gently away from the valley, and with a cliff face that dropped 1300ft to anything, and another 3500ft to the valley floor.



It goes without saying that scenery was spectacularly beautiful, rather reminiscent of but far more impressive than the Great Valley from The Land Before Time. You may think that a corny reference, but consider that Yosemite Valley has been little altered since the time of the dinosaurs. And thanks to efforts of one great American hero, John Muir (whom Mark praised from the beginning of the endeavor to its very end, repeatedly citing quotes and ideas found in Ken Burns' National Parks: America's Best Idea), it should continue to change very little since its adoption as Yosemite National Park at the end of the 19th century.


With the clouds rolling in, we began our way back down.

Friday, December 25, 2009

I Went to San Francisco but Then I Got Nostalgic

Last weekend I was in San Francisco. I wanted to write about that delightful little big city, about the wonderfully nostalgic Musee Mecanique at Fisherman's Wharf, about Chinatown (the very best of all the Chinatowns), about people-watching on Market Street and about the Golden Gate Bridge, but as I've now been home for four days already, it's not really any of those things that are resonating at this point.

(Well, that's not completely true. I do have a very deep fondness for bridges, as architectural marvels and simply as large things that have great aesthetic appeal to me, and to those ends the Golden Gate Bridge certainly holds its own as an iconic landmark, and I would have loved to walk back and forth across its entire 8,981 foot span, but we only had time to make it to the first tower.) But I digress.

I don't know if you have ever been one of those people lucky enough to find themselves sailing around the world with a boat load of strangers, taking classes, tasting cultures, and rocking in the midst of a few months chock so full of life-changing experiences it leaves you reeling and exhausted, taking naps after morning classes that span the entire gap between lunch and dinner, but let me tell you, in circumstances like that, lasting connections are made amongst friends in a very short time.

This is the reason I was in San Francisco. It had been well over a year since my ship friends and I had had any substantial reunion of more than one or two others. This time there were six of us, hardly the full gang, but a remarkable feat nonetheless considering all of us recent graduates or grad students are broke and/or busy as hell. Four reunions (and smaller visits in between) in the two and a half years that have passed since we disembarked the MV Explorer in San Diego in May of 2007 seems like a pretty good ratio, but I'm telling you it's not nearly enough, because:

Ah, but look at us now!

  • These are the people I still see, still talk to, and still love two and a half years later.
  • These are the people who have traveled to come together in Madison, Pittsburgh, Washington D.C., Orange County, Chicago, San Francisco, and some other cities I couldn't make it to.
  • These are the people who still spend far too much time talking at meals, and who help me remember the experiences and stories that have slipped through the cracks of a memory trying to contain far too many adventures for a boy so young.
  • These are the people who, unquestionably, will be very near the top of a wedding invitation list some day, sharing their own table, taking too long to eat, and probably drinking too much, too.
  • These are the kind of friends we never forget.


Waikiki Beach, Hawai'i, 2007

(Thanks to Jess for the pic.)

Baker Beach, San Francisco, Last Weekend

(Thanks to Steph for the pic, and my apologies to those who could not make it, we missed you.)

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

On Writing

I'm amazed to find that, according to trusty Google Analytics, people still check this blog, at least 5 people a day! Mostly they seem to be referrals from other sites or people who are looking for real experiences abroad. One query that led here was "stories from people who have hiked the Milford Track", and I cannot tell you how very satisfying that specificity is.

I'm still working on finding a life after graduation, but I've got some good leads. Soon I'm going to be writing for Examiner.com, a website with all sorts of articles by regular people. It's meant to be an insider's guide to whatever local thing you happen to be looking up. My particular niche will be Madison travel writing. I hope it pans out, and also that I can find some funds to obtain a digital SLR camera of my own to supplement anything I write here or there.

Yesterday I went sailing on Lake Mendota again. It was a warm, calm day, so we sailed lazily from one end of the lake to the other and back again, opting for casualness and Bud Light Limes over the sailing race we'd actually taken the boat out for. Can you imagine a better way to spend a summer evening?

In a bit over two weeks I'll be off to Disney World again, and I'm sure I'll have something to say about that magical place. My roommate is insisting that I supplement the trip with a copy of Carl Hiaasen's Team Rodent: How Disney Devours the World. We'll see how that goes. In the meantime, I'm still enjoying Bill Bryson's A Short History of Nearly Everything, which has me appreciating the idiosyncratic history of science, and which has also instilled in me a very deep paranoia regarding asteroids.

Monday, June 29, 2009

Transformers 2

It is regrettable that I don't have the means to finance further adventures to share with you all, but that hasn't stopped me from writing altogether.

I recently saw Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, which was unbelievably awful, but I had the opportunity to review it for The Badger Herald, despite no longer being a student. You can read it here.

For any family and such who may not know, The Badger Herald is the University of Wisconsin's independent student newspaper. I've written for the ArtsEtc. section since the fall semester of 2008 and served as an Associate ArtsEtc. Editor in the spring of 2009. I mention this all by way of background information when I suddenly post a random article of mine, although I do take a certain pride in the Herald, as it seems far better journalistically, aesthetically, and in almost every way of the newspapers that my parents read, The West Bend Daily News (click for an entertainingly inaccessible website) and the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. It is also the largest independent student newspaper in the world, with a daily circulation of 15,000 during the academic year. Comparatively, the Journal-Sentinel has a daily circ of just under 220,000, but serves an area population of well over one million, as opposed to a single university campus.

I miss working in a newspaper office. It was everything you see in the movies — loud, fun, disheveled, and unpredictable. My desk was a card table and I had to provide my own computer, but I loved it. And as an editor my chief responsibility was to prove that every written word I came across was of insufficient quality, or at the very least formatted incorrectly, these duties capitalizing on skills of criticism that I've long since mastered. I even think what I write is garbage.

Monday, June 22, 2009

On Broadway and Off, New York City

I[heart]NY. Everyone who is going to write anything about the city does, even if they thoroughly despise it. It's such a bustling and lively place that it's chock full of interesting tidbits and good stories, even if you do hate it, and in fact sometimes especially if you hate it. There's much to be said about the cost of everything, crowds, the slowness of tourists ambling blindly about Times Square, but I won't complain much about those things because I rather love New York, a town I've found to be remarkably manageable considering its enormity.

(Well, generally manageable that is. You can find just about anything, but often not when you're looking for it, even with an iPhone. I should not have walked around midtown Manhattan for 30 minutes looking for pizza and end up at a Times Square Sbarro, even near midnight. And finding a cup of coffee that isn't from Starbucks or a deli is nigh impossible, and to this end I must extend credit to Madison for better catering to coffee fiends like myself. Also, there was the time we accidentally boarded an express subway and bypassed our intended destination of Central Park by about 50 blocks and wound up in Harlem.)

See, you can find everything.

But as I was saying, New York is a city so great that when you say you're going to New York people generally assume you mean the city and disregard the state altogether. The only other time that might feasibly happen is if you said you were going to Kansas, in which case Kansas City is probably the assured destination merely because there aren't any other destinations in Kansas to my knowledge, and even then they might think you were headed to Kansas City, Missouri.

We checked into our hotel early and found our room to be rather agreeable, if not modestly sized. My mother and I shared a queen-sized bed in a room the size of a king-sized bed, but the shower was excellent and the breakfast free, both commodities being of great value here. Although, our one, tremendously slow elevator was broken a few times, in which case we would have to take the service elevator. This was a little box that looked like a birdcage, made with thin bands of steel and a metal gate for a door, such that you could see all four sides of the elevator shaft at any given moment. Also, there were no buttons, so a mechanic was always present as a stand-in elevator operator, using a lever to make the thing go up and down and responding to bell rings on different floors, once arguing with a cleaning lady in Italian for making him stop at her floor while he was clearly busy with guests. She would just have to carry her housekeeping cart to the next floor. I tried to avoid growing old in either elevator by taking the stairs, but as our room was on the 9th floor I quickly decided that patience was the best method.

Broadway
Among the many things I love are tall buildings, bridges, and Broadway musicals. New York has all of these, and I shall talk briefly about them in due course, starting with Broadway, since it took up the most amount of our time and constituted the vast majority of our expenses. We managed three Broadway shows in just four days, which I'm rather proud of.

How Broadway is struggling as much as it is is something of a mystery to me, but it certainly isn't for lack of support from the Straub family. Did you know that your average orchestra-level Broadway seat costs $125? And somehow, despite these generally being the best seats, you can easily spend $250 for one ticket at a show if you were so inclined. We paid full-price for one show, Wicked, which was well worth the cost, but for the others, Accent on Youth and The Phantom of the Opera we got half-price tickets from the Theatre Development Fund's TKTS booths, which are probably the best thing NYC has ever done for its tourists, aside from taking the hookers off of Times Square and 42nd Street (though neither has improved in regards to character).

It's the Broadway spectacles that attract me. I freely admit to being the worst sort of cliché fan of Broadway. I like the shows that are tried and true and which have the most extravagant sets, lights, and pyrotechnics. I've seen at least a baker's dozen Broadway shows, most being the big productions everyone recognizes. [Note: A subsequent revisiting of old ticket stubs reveals that I've seen at least 16.] What's more, I've generally had remarkably good seats at these (a special thanks to my parents here). But the reason I like the elaborate shows so much is not only because they're a thrill to watch, but the mechanics involved are incredible. I spent a few years working tech crew at my own high school's musicals, and I am here to tell you that as smoothly as those shows run, nothing about being backstage is easy. It's a little like an episode of "ER." Something goes wrong and pandemonium breaks out, with people running amok, frantically trying to figure out a solution before anyone in the audience can notice, all the while the crew displacing blame to someone in the cast and the cast doing the same to the crew. It's quite fun.

But the first show we saw, Accent on Youth, was not a spectacle, as it was not a musical. Rather, it was a good-hearted, witty, subtly hilarious sort of play about growing old featuring David Hyde Pierce of "Frasier" fame. That one was especially nice because it catered to an older crowd who respected proper Broadway policies.

Call me old-fashioned (a 22-year-old should not need to use this phrase), but there are certain rules Broadway audiences no longer respect, even at $125 a ticket. For one thing, jean shorts are not acceptable attire, nor should denim be worn in any respect, excepting perhaps that a nice jacket is donned. But, far more importantly, do not bring your bratty kids or screaming infants. At Phantom of the Opera a mother-daughter pair was sitting next to me eating candies out of a plastic bag (this being explicitly condemned at the beginning of every show), while the mother narrated every damn moment of the show to the girl, who was perpetually behind on the show's events precisely because of the mother's narration, always missing what was happening and therefore needing further explanation to catch up. And then the girl began perusing the playbill during the show's climax with her mother's indiglo watch, at which point I nearly bent over and said, "You know, they have turned the lights off for good reason."

Another good example is the mother who brought an infant to Wicked. I don't mean that by way of disrespect to a toddler, I mean an infant, swaddling clothes and all. At least three times the baby began screaming and had to be taken out through the theatre's creaky doors, much to the dismay of the entire Goddamn theatre.

Anyhow, Wicked is the show I've longed to see for years, being one of very few "big shows" I hadn't yet seen and being a story that was quite fascinating to me. As a child, while most friends I know reminisce about their fear of the Wicked Witch and her flying monkeys, I would fast forward to the parts with the Wicked Witch (especially when she melts!) because she was my favorite character. I had a similar fascination with Ursula from The Little Mermaid. So anyhow, the story intrigued me and I'd heard nothing but good things about the show, which lived up to my expectations in every possible way. The graphic designer in me is even mildly fascinated with the show's poster (right). I was like a kid on Christmas morning walking to our 10th-row seats, taking in the remarkably built-up proscenium and studying the map of Oz covering the stage. When the "Defying Gravity" scene began refusing to blink was all I could do to keep my goosebumps under control... Except that I thought Elphaba was supposed to fly at the end of that song. Can anyone clear this up for me? Everyone my mother and I asked who had seen the show seems oddly unable to recall. Either way I see this as a Broadway failure, whether the crew failed to get her hooked up to a rig (and it certainly looked like that was attempted) or it was not written into the song that's all about flying. Still, what a tremendous performance.

Lastly, we saw The Phantom of the Opera, Broadway's longest-running musical at 20 years, and which felt a good many years stale. I don't know if it is too recycled a show or a cast with poor chemistry and largely unimpressive voices. The opening scene with the auction and the restoration of the original theatre set was quite impressive, but the chandelier crashing back down mid-show was disappointingly anti-climactic. It's a great piece of set design, to be sure, but for a chandelier to "crash" and make no noise, just a big flash of light, is ridiculous and laughable.

But the thing about Phantom that I've always loved is the story. I read the book by Gaston Leroux years ago, and it's exactly the sort of dark, gloomy, vaguely mystical tale I love. Even if the book is somewhat dull, the story is among my favorites, but much of this gets lost in translation to the romanticized versions we're familiar with. For one, the Phantom is a stalker and killer — there's really no away around this plainly obvious fact — and to see him blubbering on stage when Christine runs off with Raoul incites feelings of awkward discomfort rather than sympathy. We should sympathize with his story, but he's not a whiner. And Christine herself is an interesting character since she seems to live up to all kinds of old-age ideals about femininity. She's a dolt, you see, who is easily persuaded by flattery and quite literally has a difficult time choosing between French nobility and a sociopathic murderer, making her decision based on sweet nothings rather than merits of personality because, let's face it, not much about the Phantom screams endearment. I guess that's another point for Wicked, one of remarkably few stories with [more than one] strong female lead.

Not on Broadway, but related, is that we also saw a live taping of The Late Show with David Letterman, who is not any funnier live. Getting into the show involved standing in a long series of lines, which usually led to other lines elsewhere in the area, throughout which time college-aged students are practicing your laughs with you and leading you to believe that if you don't laugh and cheer at everything you are a lousy audience and a boring person because you must perceive everything that happens as hilarious, even when it usually isn't. It's all a bit fraudulent.

Off Broadway
I talked my mother into walking the Brooklyn Bridge with me, although we only walked half-way because there wasn't anything in Brooklyn we wanted to see. The Brooklyn Bridge is an astounding architectural accomplishment, over 125 years old, and showing no signs of weakness, outliving most other bridges round the world built at about the same time. It is over a mile long and seems fit to hold anything you care to put on it, even in windy conditions, despite being built before much was known about bridges' uncomfortable relationship with aerodynamics and what can happen when that relationship isn't understood (see Galloping Gertie). P.T. Barnum once led 21 elephants over the Bridge in a parade during a period of uncertainty over its stability, and the Bridge was understandably packed with as much weight as it is ever likely to hold during the mass exodus from Manhattan following the closure of the subways on 9/11.

The rest of our time in New York was spent with a little of this and that at a leisurely pace. We visited not a single museum and spent less than 30 minutes in Central Park, all of which I'm quite fine with. It was miserable weather-wise, with constant rain dampening the mood and any desire to take pictures (New York loses its charm when set against a gray backdrop).

When it rains New Yorkers shuffle along drearily with their black umbrellas as if they had just come from a funeral that was of great inconvenience to them. You could tell tourists by the color of their umbrellas, which clashed with everyone else's. The volume of umbrellas moving along with the many pedestrians in New York provides for some rather dangerous obstacles as well. Many of them nearly poked me in the eyeballs (usually my mother's bright blue one), while others just redirected raindrops onto my uncovered head or shoulders. And to be sure, New Yorkers would sooner stab you in the face with the pointy ends of their umbrellas than allow for any minor variances in their route. One girl demanded that I move as she walked towards me, despite walking in the very middle of the sidewalk just as I was, as if she had the right of way simply because she'd claimed it first. But then, New Yorkers aren't known for their friendliness. This traffic problem extends to any place where there are people, including crosswalks. You know your traffic is bad when cops must direct traffic at a regular intersection, this being quite common. And speaking of cops, what is it about the NYPD? They all look as if they were cast in Hollywood, every one of them fit and attractive with a very precise degree of racial variation.

Other than that, I met up with cousins, I met up with a friend from Semester at Sea, I ate at a lovely Greek diner and a place that only sells variations of Mac & Cheese. I also boldly tried a New York Egg Creme, only to learn that it contains neither eggs nor cream.